Comments on: Weird Bug in Firefox

By: Harsh J

Harsh J — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:08:52 +0000

Mehul – What did the previous comment mean?

By: mehul

mehul — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 06:53:58 +0000

kalpik new gravatars aren’t available for now. check their site.

By: Kalpik

Kalpik — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:39:33 +0000

Huh?! Gravatar is working aint it?! I can see the gravatars!

By: mehul

mehul — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:32:55 +0000

Hey remove the words ‘loading page’. now we have something nice in there.
Long live opera. Opera rules!

By: Harsh J

Harsh J — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:08:44 +0000

@DJ – You’ll have to wait until they come back

By: Harsh J

Harsh J — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:05:14 +0000

@DJ and Kalpik – But my point wasn’t exactly that. Indeed it isn’t a bug at all, it was just my way of telling a weird part of code But what I actually meant is, is that a normal editor or a mini-browser in itself? Rohit @ http://www.visualreactor.org says its something to do with the editor being dynamic?

By: DJ

DJ — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:05:05 +0000

hehe, Thanks Kalpik.

Ohh btw, when is Gravatar gonna return. I am dying to get one, just like ya’ll. Or am I just stupid enough NOT to know how to get it

By: Kalpik

Kalpik — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:53:04 +0000

Well DJ is right! IE error pages are pages, but firefox errors are not pages

By: Chrono Cr@cker

Chrono Cr@cker — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:32:29 +0000

Hey nice one…

By: DJ

DJ — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:29:52 +0000

Well,

I wouldn’t really call that a bug, you know.

The “Page not found” is an error message rather than a “page”. So FF cannot go look for the “source” of that and hence again shows a Page not found.

Or maybe I am wrong. Who knows :-s