<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new print function in Python 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/</link>
	<description>Memoirs of a QWERTY Keyboard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harsh</title>
		<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/comment-page-1/#comment-74689</link>
		<dc:creator>Harsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/#comment-74689</guid>
		<description>It might help learning about the uglier part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://docs.python.org/release/2.5.2/ref/print.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;old print statements&lt;/a&gt;. The redirector-like symbols, particularly. After I saw those in action somewhere, I got convinced that having print as a function object is much more pythonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might help learning about the uglier part of the <a href="http://docs.python.org/release/2.5.2/ref/print.html" rel="nofollow">old print statements</a>. The redirector-like symbols, particularly. After I saw those in action somewhere, I got convinced that having print as a function object is much more pythonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulomus</title>
		<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/comment-page-1/#comment-74670</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulomus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/#comment-74670</guid>
		<description>I still hate it, but could be won over. My reaction to the print and format changes are that Guido should have said &quot;If you want Java, you know where to get it&quot;.
I predict that Python 4.0 will have brace syntax (with equally fervent declarations of why whitespace delimiting was always a mistake).

OTOH, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The real test is whether I come around after coding in it for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still hate it, but could be won over. My reaction to the print and format changes are that Guido should have said &#8220;If you want Java, you know where to get it&#8221;.<br />
I predict that Python 4.0 will have brace syntax (with equally fervent declarations of why whitespace delimiting was always a mistake).</p>
<p>OTOH, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. The real test is whether I come around after coding in it for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaiah</title>
		<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/comment-page-1/#comment-72852</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 23:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/#comment-72852</guid>
		<description>Still hate it! I also don&#039;t see why they couldn&#039;t keep the original print as well. They should of just made the print function an additional feature and called it printp or something.

A language should be flexible, I don&#039;t like being forced. And plus I don&#039;t see why they needed to change the original at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still hate it! I also don&#8217;t see why they couldn&#8217;t keep the original print as well. They should of just made the print function an additional feature and called it printp or something.</p>
<p>A language should be flexible, I don&#8217;t like being forced. And plus I don&#8217;t see why they needed to change the original at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Python: iterate (and read) all files in a directory (folder) &#187; Autarchy of the Private Cave</title>
		<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/comment-page-1/#comment-67176</link>
		<dc:creator>Python: iterate (and read) all files in a directory (folder) &#187; Autarchy of the Private Cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/#comment-67176</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks Dt for mentioning print being promoted from a statement to a function. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks Dt for mentioning print being promoted from a statement to a function. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anurag Bhandari</title>
		<link>http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/comment-page-1/#comment-67151</link>
		<dc:creator>Anurag Bhandari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harshj.com/2008/12/09/the-new-print-function-in-python-3/#comment-67151</guid>
		<description>I was waiting for Python 3 since long. And finally it&#039;s here with all the goodies.

I too personally like the all new print function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was waiting for Python 3 since long. And finally it&#8217;s here with all the goodies.</p>
<p>I too personally like the all new print function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

